The COVID-19 Arrow: Striking at the Heart of American Life and Culture

The COVID-19 Arrow: Striking at the Heart of American Life and Culture

This is identified as a social network challenge because it is not easy to get all people to embrace NPI. This is where the second and third challenges that I have identified come to the fore. Powerfully influential, large and abundant social networks can be found in some societies (that I will identify as “enmeshed” societies and cultures) but are much smaller in size and number and much less influential in other societies and cultures (that I will identify as “disengaged” societies and cultures).

When the society or culture is disengaged (such as is the case in the United States), then a small number of social networks can make all the difference regarding spread of the virus. Christakis puts it this way:

In many real-world social networks, most people have very few contacts and a small minority have many connections. This small minority are the ones who often go on to become super-spreaders. So SARS-2 is more likely to reach these well-connected people, and they are more likely to spread it to a large number of people. In fact, mathematical models of a disease spreading over such net­ works with super-spreaders closely mirror the observed trajectory of real cases of COVID-19. However, just having a large number of contacts, however defined or ascertained, does not mean someone is necessarily a super-spreader. Christakis (2020, p. 56)

How do you discovered these networks and how do you influence what happens in these networks—for they tend to be quite isolated with strong boundaries. They are hard to influence. Social psychologists can play an important role in analyzing these networks—often aided by computer-based simulation tools (such as agent-based modeling).

Individualism:  There are important, historical distinction to be drawn between societies and culture that are highly individualistic and those that tip toward collectivism. I have borrowed a term from the field of family psychology to describe the individualistic culture as one of disengagement. Individuals and units (families, organizations, communities) in a disengaged culture tend to operate independently of other individuals and units. There is often little societal “glue” (such as shared traditions, history and rituals) that would bring and hold people together. Robert Sommer (1969) would describe this as a society that is replete with sociofugal settings. These are settings in which people tend to be pulled outward or thrown away from one another.

The disengaged culture in this society, in turn, relates to an ethic of individual rights. In such a society, I am entitled to maximum freedom and are not required to comply with what other people want of me in terms of my behavior or my responsibility for their welfare. In such a society, NPIs are likely to be ignored or even actively resisted, as are inoculations that are either recommended or required: “I don’t need to wear a mask!” “It is my right to stand wherever I want when associating with other people.” “I don’t have to get my arm poked with some needle just because you want me to.”  “It is stupid that we are sacrificing our economy just because some people think these restrictions will somehow make a different—I don’t really trust the experts and those who want to control our nation!”


Share this:

About the Author

Avatar photo

William BergquistWilliam Bergquist, Ph.D. An international coach and consultant in the fields of psychology, management and public administration, author of more than 50 books, and president of a psychology institute. Dr. Bergquist consults on and writes about personal, group, organizational and societal transitions and transformations. His published work ranges from the personal transitions of men and women in their 50s and the struggles of men and women in recovering from strokes to the experiences of freedom among the men and women of Eastern Europe following the collapse of the Soviet Union. In recent years, Bergquist has focused on the processes of organizational coaching. He is coauthor with Agnes Mura of coachbook, co-founder of the International Journal of Coaching in Organizations and co-founder of the International Consortium for Coaching in Organizations.

View all posts by William Bergquist

Leave a Reply