The Nature and Function of Dreams I. An Overview

The Nature and Function of Dreams I. An Overview

A dream which is not understood is like a letter which is not opened. –Talmud

The world has long been fascinated with dreams and the function they serve. In some traditional cultures, the life we live in a dream has even been considered the real life and the source of all important wisdom, whereas our daytime life is merely an illusion. At the very least, dreams have often been considered the province of the Gods. We find, for instance, that the God of Israel (Yahweh) is often informing and directing his people through dreams. In many societies, dreams were used to predict the future and to point out the potential for deception on the part of trusted “friends.”

Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Dreams

Much of the way in which dreams were viewed (at least in the Western world) changed at the beginning of the 20st Century when Sigmund Freud entered the scene.

Freud’s Perspective

In his remarkable The Interpretation of Dreams (Freud, 2000/2010), Freud turned not to the external gods, but rather to three internal “gods” of the human psyche. Let me introduce these three “gods.” Freud believes they are the primary authors and directors of human dreams. I will embellish on Freud’s portrayal of each of these three.

First, there is ID. According to Freud, the ID as an unrestrained voice for primitive urges. I imagine that sometime ID is dressed all in red, with a cape that swirls around as he moves in and out of the scene urging more drama and, in particular, more lust. Sometimes, she also is dressed all in red with a lot of flesh showing. She is always trying to seduce the actors or at least encouraging them to seduce one another. He looks a lot like Satan, and she looks a lot like a harlot. He/she lives for the opportunity to say “YES.”ID is often both the scriptwriter and the director.

Second, there is SUPER-Ego. Sometimes she is dressed all in black and is always marching in to demand restraint of the actors. She looks a lot like a prissy schoolmarm or library attendant. Sometimes, he is also dressed all in black, looking a lot like a hell and damnation preacher. She/he is very judgmental. And lives for the opportunity to say “NO.” SUPER-Ego is usually not the script writer, but does play the role of director and, most importantly, modified of the script presented by ID.

Third, there is EGO. He/she is dressed in “sensible” clothes and is standing at the edge of the stage, taking notes and occasionally negotiating with the actors (and the other three directors) on the nature and purpose of the dream. He/she is also checking with a focus group on how they think the play is working. He/she lives for the opportunity to say: “We can make it work.” EGO is often both scriptwriter and director.

Attachments

Share this:

About the Author

William BergquistWilliam Bergquist, Ph.D. An international coach and consultant in the fields of psychology, management and public administration, author of more than 50 books, and president of a psychology institute. Dr. Bergquist consults on and writes about personal, group, organizational and societal transitions and transformations. His published work ranges from the personal transitions of men and women in their 50s and the struggles of men and women in recovering from strokes to the experiences of freedom among the men and women of Eastern Europe following the collapse of the Soviet Union. In recent years, Bergquist has focused on the processes of organizational coaching. He is coauthor with Agnes Mura of coachbook, co-founder of the International Journal of Coaching in Organizations and co-founder of the International Consortium for Coaching in Organizations.

View all posts by William Bergquist

Leave a Reply