The Roots of Collaborative Innovation

The Roots of Collaborative Innovation

As a result, the human decision-making process in practice really consists in a search through a finite number of options, the fewer the better. People tend to identify with sub-goals rather than with global aims, exploit pre-existing structures or regularities in the environment, apply approximate or heuristic approaches to problems, and be content with good enough solutions. Moreover, the stochastic vs. combinatorically optimized noise generation ambiguity emphasizes the traditional major IDB problem (Fiorini, 2014a) in current most advanced instrumentation system, still at the inner core of human knowledge extraction by experimentation in science (Fiorini, 2017a).

Therefore, to grasp a more reliable, effective representation of reality and to get more realistic physical and biological simulation techniques, differently from the past, researchers and scientists need two intelligently articulated hands: both stochastic and combinatorical approaches synergistically articulated by natural coupling (Fiorini, 2017c).

It is time to recall Einstein’s inspirational quote: “The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.” It is time to start a new era on the deep awareness of the original configuration! Present planetary problems are the legacy of multiscale-order deficiencies from the past, obsolete, Western, human reductionist worldview. They cannot be fixed by the usual, traditional, hierarchical approach alone, by doing what we do better or more intensely, but rather by changing the way we do, the way we understand the deep meaning of data and information. We need “New Eyes” to find innovative solutions to old problems (Fiorini, 2018a, 2018b, 2019b).

Today the ever-accelerating progress of technology and changes in the mode of human life give the appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue. It may well be that we are approaching the end of one of those cycles and need to prepare for a more significant reframing of the basis for information, knowledge and civilization in the age to come, starting from the bottom and going up.

Attachments

Share this:

About the Author

Rodolfo FioriniDr, Rodolfo A. Fiorini is Professor of Bioengineering at Politecnico di Milano University, Milano, Italy. He had joined research projects with Stanford University and University of California at Los Angeles. He has received awards and honors from Italian National Research Council, University and Research Ministry, U.S.A DOL,etc. Since 1981, at Politecnico di Milano, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Dr. Fiorini's research activities have been giving a tangible contribution to the development of new generation Biomedical Systems and Guidelines, to the creation of new Biomedical Professionals, Biometrics and Cybiometrics Systems, Strategic Active Support Systems for e-Gov Healthcare Business to shape the Biotechnology Laboratory and the Hospital of the Future to human life, public health and wellbeing, He is the founder and coordinator of the Research Group on Computational Information Conservation Theory (CICT). and the use of intercultural transdisciplinary approaches for the creation of reality levels where engineering and life sciences can synergistically interact to promote scientific discovery for common wellbeing. He is WAAS (World Academy of Art and Science) Trustee, IEEE, EMB, AAAS, and JTiBS Editorial Board Member

View all posts by Rodolfo Fiorini

Leave a Reply