The Roots of Collaborative Innovation

46. OAC, Online Archive of California (2019), Guide to the R. Buckminster Fuller Papers M1090, p.527, Box 527, Folder 10, Hamilton Extracts, Vol.7 [3of4] n.d. Accessed at https://oac.cdlib.org/view?style=oac4;view=dsc;docId=tf109n9832&query=programs&dsc.position=17501
47. Olson, J. (2005). Axiological Investigations. Uppsala, Sweden: ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS. Accessed at

48. Pacioli, L. (1982). De divina proportione. Milano, IT: Silvana Editoriale, (in Italian).
49. Pappus of Alexandria (2016). Archimedean solids. Accessed at
http://www.math.nyu.edu/~crorres/Archimedes/Solids/Pappus.html
50. Poli, R. (2013). Les signaux faibles, une propension social spontanée. Cahiers de la sécurité 1, 28–32.
51. Prat-i-Pubill, Q. (2018). Axiological knowledge in a knowledge driven world. Considerations for organizations. Frederiksberg, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business school, Doctoral School of Organisation and Management Studies. Accessed at https://openarchive.cbs.dk/bitstream/handle/10398/9672/Queralt%20Prat-i-Pubill.pdf?sequence=1
52. Roberts, R. C.(2003). Emotions: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Russell, S., and Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
54. Schwab, K. (2015). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it Means, How to Respond. Foreign Affairs. LaVergne, TN, USA: Lightning Source, Inc. Accessed at
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution
55. Simon, H. A. (1981). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
56. Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
57. Smessaert, H., and Demey, L. (2015). La Géometrie Logique du Dodécaèdre Rhombique des Oppositions [The logical geometry of the rhombic dodecahedron of oppositions]. In S. Chatti (Ed.), Le Carré et ses Extensions: Approches Théoriques, Pratiques et Historiques (pp. 127-157). Tunisia: Publications de la faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines de Tunis. Univ. de Tunis.
58. Steinhaus, H. (1999). Mathematical snapshots. New York, NY, USA: Dover, 3rd ed.
59. Taleb, N. N. (2015). Silent Risk. Lectures on Probability, Vol. 1. Online: Des Cartes. Accessed at http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/SilentRisk.pdf
60. Thompson, E. W. (2010). Epistemological Axiology: What Is The Value Of Knowledge? Master’s Thesis. Knoxville, Tennessee, USA: University of Tennessee. Accessed at http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1874&context=utk_gradthes
61. TRIIWT, The Research Institute for the Integration of World Thought (2019). IV. Axiology: A Theory of Value. Accessed at https://www.unification-thought.org/eut/eut04.html
62. Wheatley, M. (2006). Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World. San Francisco, CA, USA: Berret-Koehler Publ. Inc.
63. Wickström, G., and Bendix, T. (2000). The “Hawthorne effect” – what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? ) Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 26(4), :363-367.
64. Yaneva, A. (2009). Making the Social Hold: Towards an Actor-Network Theory of Design. Design and Culture 1(3), 273–288.
65. Zucconi, A. (2016). The Need for Person-Centered Education, Cadmus 3(1), 1–26.